About UsProfessional ServicesROIEnhanced Reporting & IntegrationTemporary ServicesIndustry NewsClients & Case StudiesArticlesWFM Vendor Links
 
/ Home / Articles /

What's Eating Your ROI?
The Business Case for Workforce Management Optimization (Part Two)

What's Eating Your ROI?
The Business Case for Workforce Management Optimization (Part One)

Workforce Management:
The Agent Self Service Revolution
(Part Two in a Two Part Series)

Archives...

The WorkForce Management Guide to:
Center Performance Data Integration
--Part Two--

Benjamin Funnell
WFM Consultant
The WorkForce Management Group, Inc.
www.wfmg.com


Click Here to read Part 1

Does your contact center accurately report center performance to calculate future staffing requirements? You may be surprised what you uncover by looking under some unturned stones.

A CLOSE LOOK AT AHT

In the simplest of terms, AHT is the sum of average talk time (ATT) and average after call work (ACW). ATT is the time from the beginning of time an agent begins working on the event with the customer to the time the customer leaves. After the customer has left the agent, further time may be necessary to complete the work generated by the initial event known as ACW.

Workload = events * (ATT + ACW)

As simple as it seems, Average handle time, AHT, is one of, if not the most frequently misrepresented data elements in contact center performance reporting. The reasons for the misrepresentation are the lack of understanding the variables comprising AHT, the effect of hold time, the inability to apply actual handle time to the same interval as the event worked, inconsistent agent workstate management, and an activity allocation issue caused by multi-skilled agents. Each issue has the potential of causing an extreme impact to the over-all ability to report actual performance in addition to the forecasting of staffing requirements.

AHT Integration Process Options

The actual values reported for AHT performance are dependant upon the location of the source data and the integration process used to transfer data from an ACD to WFM. There are primarily two methods for integrating data from an ACD, real-time and the reporting of performance by time-increment. Each of these methods will report different AHT values.

AHT Interval collection is the sending of the AHT value each half hour, or other determined length of time, from the ACD and collected within the WFM system. In the majority of ACD, the time used to derive the AHT value is based upon the interval in which an event ends. If an event starts at 11:58 and ends at 12:02, the event was 4 minutes in length. All 4 minutes of work will be applied to the 12:00 to 12:30 increment. The negative effect of this process is that the AHT will be understated for the 11:30 to 12:00 while 12:00 to 12:30 will be overstated. The greatest effect caused by this integration method is seen at the beginning and the end of the day because the peak periods of the day will have both negative and positive effects being applied. A positive point of using this process is that the data is retrievable from the ACD as long as it stores the data, data integration can occur at any time.

The alternative approach to reporting AHT is through the real-time collection of agent workstate time. This process consists of sending a continuous datastream from the ACD to WFM containing all changes to agent workstates. The total amount of time within each workstate is then calculated and divided by the total number of events handled over the same increment of time. This process applies the work to the proper increment. A negative point is that if the datastream is down for any length of time, the data cannot be re-sent and is lost. Note needs to be taken that not all ACD will support real time data streaming.

The real-time process is also dependant upon employees being properly defined within the WFM application to associate the work time. All employees that potentially work scheduled activities need defined. If an agent, lead, supervisor, trainer, etc. works an activity and is not defined, the time worked is lost resulting in an incorrect reporting of AHT and ultimately incorrect forecasted staffing requirements.

Average Talk Time

Average talk time (ATT), the primary component of AHT, is straightforward but how hold time is represented needs to be reviewed. Talk time accuracy issues arise when hold time is not known to be included. Work time can possibly be missing if hold time is not counted or even overstated if double counted. If hold time cannot be factored into the AHT, the work time should be summed regularly and included as a shrinkage category.

After Call Work

After call work (ACW), the follow-up work that is required from a previous event and the second primary component of AHT, is the most common element that causes inaccurate workload performance reporting. Reporting ACW is difficult because it is dependant upon an agent’s ability to place their phone or CTI into the proper work state and due to the affects of multi-skilled agents.

Determining what activities are supposed to be included in ACW is vital to properly reporting performance. Ultimately, all activities are defined prior to the setup of data integration. Usually the guideline for determining if an activity should be included in ACW is if it is a direct result of an inbound activity. Activities that are not a direct result of an inbound activity should be defined as a shrinkage category and be managed and planned independently. For example, training is an activity but not associated to an event generated by a customer. The activity of sending a fax to the plant to finish a customer order, in most instances, is included in ACW.

Upon determining the different activities to be included in ACW, the agents need to be educated on what phone and CTI workstates represent what activities. This education is ideally supported through quality control monitoring and coaching.

Multi-skilled agents make ACW even more complex. Centers with multi-skilled agents using an ACW will not be able to associate the ACW time to the proper activity. If agents are assigned to handle two activities and place themselves into ACW, there is no link to associate the work and activity. Some ACD and WFM applications will report the ACW time to the most recent inbound activity, while other ACD will only report the overall ACW time.

A CLOSE LOOK AT SOME NUMBERS

Let us look at some efficiency numbers to see the impact of not staffing properly due to an inaccurate representation of center performance.

In this scenario, a center has one activity and handles 1000 events during a day with a talk time of 3 minutes. However, the after call work does not include all of the after call work activities and reports 45 seconds instead of 1 minute. The overall cost is that the activity will be understaffed by approximately 6%.

1000 events handled
180 seconds talk time
45 sec reported ACW
15 sec of unreported ACW

15 / 240 = Approximately 6% understaffed

Looking at a similar scenario where the ACW includes activities such as extra unscheduled breaks and reports 75 seconds instead of 1 minute. The overall cost is that the activity will be overstaffed by approximately 6%.

These figures quickly justify why the review of each data element is so important to the success of workforce management principles and practices.

SUMMARIZING OUR POINTS

In summary, the following points must be reviewed to successfully manage a data integration process for the transfer of center performance data.

  • Provide proper resources to support the data integration setup.
  • Review vendor supplied reports
  • Review WFM reported data to determine if it is integrated data or based upon a WFM formula.
  • Review the center definition of abandoned and offered events
  • Review Hold Time in calculation of Talk Time
  • Review what activities are to be used to calculate after call work and which are shrinkage categories
  • Review Operations workstate management procedures

The data integration process is an extremely vital component of a successful workforce management system implementation. In order for workforce management to produce an accurate staffing requirement forecast, there must be an accurate representation of the center’s historical performance based upon the specific center and activity goals.


The WorkForce Manager is a publication of
the WorkForce Management Group, Inc.
All Rights Reserved

Please send comments and questions to info@wfmg.com
or contact WFMG at (877) 575-wfmg

     

Copyright © 1999 - 2006 The WorkForce Management Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Contact Us At: (877) 575-WFMG (9364) • info@wfmg.com
Corporate Offices: 3245 Main Street · Suite 235-197 · Frisco, TX 75034